Difference between revisions of "Talk:Psycho"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Sorry Thor; force of habit. I hadn't decided weather to remove former knights from the major listing or to create their own. I would like for them to remain on the "Knighted by year" listing. But I think that removing them all encompassing knights listing is only right. Thanks for the heads up. : ) --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 07:30, 20 February 2008 (EST) | Sorry Thor; force of habit. I hadn't decided weather to remove former knights from the major listing or to create their own. I would like for them to remain on the "Knighted by year" listing. But I think that removing them all encompassing knights listing is only right. Thanks for the heads up. : ) --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 07:30, 20 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | No worries at all. I absolutely agree that the information on people being/having been knights is pertinent and should be included as such. BTW - I figure I can try to update this page with the IM side of the debacle, if you want. I'm unsure what's really pertinent here. --[[User:Thor|Thor]] | ||
Revision as of 22:58, 20 February 2008
At the risk of possibly rubbing someone the wrong way here - I dare say that Psycho (Syko?) is no longer a Knight of Amtgard, given the correspondance presented by then King Arion of the CK to the IM when this issue last came up. --Thor
Sorry Thor; force of habit. I hadn't decided weather to remove former knights from the major listing or to create their own. I would like for them to remain on the "Knighted by year" listing. But I think that removing them all encompassing knights listing is only right. Thanks for the heads up. : ) --Linden 07:30, 20 February 2008 (EST)
No worries at all. I absolutely agree that the information on people being/having been knights is pertinent and should be included as such. BTW - I figure I can try to update this page with the IM side of the debacle, if you want. I'm unsure what's really pertinent here. --Thor
