Difference between revisions of "User talk:GloricanDeCelestus"

From AmtWiki
Line 19: Line 19:
 
Soeither way you want to looka t it... either form the lamen's way of using person activity to decide it there were always mmbers; or if you want to use the LEGAL way which is the important one because its a legal contract, we never ciesed to exist, therefore legally cannot be classified as defunct durign that tiem period.
 
Soeither way you want to looka t it... either form the lamen's way of using person activity to decide it there were always mmbers; or if you want to use the LEGAL way which is the important one because its a legal contract, we never ciesed to exist, therefore legally cannot be classified as defunct durign that tiem period.
  
My argument stands, yours Doesn't. You are trying to pad your page with more terms in office. It is well known that the chapter was under attendance requirements and was not active during the period. Hence you can't have been an officer of the chapter. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 14:04, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
+
My argument stands, yours doesn't. You are trying to pad your page with more terms in office. It is well known that the chapter was under attendance requirements and was not active during the period. Hence you can't have been an officer of the chapter. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 14:04, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
Your page has been protected due to the addition of suspect information. If you can present proof other your own view that the chapter was active and that you were and elected officer of said chapter you may re add the information. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 14:10, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:10, 21 July 2008

Glorican, chose one persona, and add the information about the other to that page. --Linden 17:18, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

Glorican, according to the rule book a player may only belong to one fighting company. --Linden 08:59, 17 June 2008 (EDT)

Listings of individual awards are located on the ORK, not the Wiki. If you continue to ignore my admonishments I will be forced to lock your pages and remove any extraneous content. --Linden 11:20, 17 June 2008 (EDT)

According to your previous edits you belong to the temples miles militia and the company Kabal. Since apparently their are no longer any members of the militia, and it was extremely short lived I will delete that information from the wiki. --Linden 09:57, 18 June 2008 (EDT)

Ahh.. i deleted that off my page a while ago. Didnt' knwo you had kept its page open. Templu sMiles Militia is a multi game group.. Darkon, Amtgard and Dagorhir.. we decided to be just a household in Amtgard till we get more members/interest.

Removed the 'sherriff of durring the time that the group you were a member of was defunct. --Linden 14:52, 19 July 2008 (EDT)

You knwo i'm getting realyl tired o you talkin to me as though i was an idiot and dont' knwo waht i'm doing... I have a 157 IQ so i'm anyhtign BUT and idiot... bad typer yes, idiot no. The gropu wasn't defeunct i jsut ralized after remember y legal class and discussing it with a lawyers friend of mine. Ilith Oloth, which we changed the name of to shattered lands, was created by force of legal contract between I, my friend, and BLs all of whom signed the contract and it was notarized. Nether party of the contract agrement have violatd the terms of said contract there by, the peramiters of the contract and the articles within still stand. In other words before this review i had THOUGHT my gropu was defunct. AFTER looking the legality of it over again, the correct legal standing is that Ilith Oloth WASN'T defunct. Nor CAN it be unless a participating party on our end were to violate the contract, which we have not done, or by our park disbanding.

It was defunct. There were no players playing. Hence 'defunct'. You can't have been the sheriff of a group that was not active. --Linden 13:47, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

1. I know the law.. amtgard decided to use legal contracts as the mechanism for adding new grous so amtgard is bound by that. 2. Ther has always been players, during that period we had less than 5 for average attendance whic i had always been told by word of mouth was required for a group to be in existance. But as i previously said. I was wrong on that issue according to US federal contract law nad in the commonwelth of VA, where our park is located, as long as we on our end lived up to the contract the aprkis still in existance. Soeither way you want to looka t it... either form the lamen's way of using person activity to decide it there were always mmbers; or if you want to use the LEGAL way which is the important one because its a legal contract, we never ciesed to exist, therefore legally cannot be classified as defunct durign that tiem period.

My argument stands, yours doesn't. You are trying to pad your page with more terms in office. It is well known that the chapter was under attendance requirements and was not active during the period. Hence you can't have been an officer of the chapter. --Linden 14:04, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Your page has been protected due to the addition of suspect information. If you can present proof other your own view that the chapter was active and that you were and elected officer of said chapter you may re add the information. --Linden 14:10, 21 July 2008 (EDT)