Difference between revisions of "User talk:128.227.2.100"

From AmtWiki
(Created page with 'In your opinion is an insult. Other people have chosen to use it as an honorific for knighthood. Some others use the myriad of other words. --~~~~')
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Seriously, this fight again?--[[User:Linden|Linden]] 13:30, 28 March 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
 
In your opinion is an insult. Other people have chosen to use it as an honorific for knighthood. Some others use the myriad of other words. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 22:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 
In your opinion is an insult. Other people have chosen to use it as an honorific for knighthood. Some others use the myriad of other words. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 22:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
...
 +
 +
Actually, according to several online references, it's a term indicating that the person addressed is:
 +
#Male
 +
#Inferior to you in some way
 +
 +
It's a variant on "Sir", but (from what I see floating around the intarwebs), not a complimentary one.  I suppose ElSpeth could be Taking It Back.
 +
 +
Meh.
 +
 +
--[[User:LucasTheLost|Lucas]] 00:28, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
The word is an insult. All the reputable dictionaries agree, as does historical usage. Check out Random House, Websters, or American Heritage. "Sir" is a root word of "sirrah", but that does not mean it means the same thing. It is a derogatory term, typically indicating a male due to it having "sir" as a root word.
 +
 +
"Sir" is the redirect for all honorifics for knighthood. Since 'Sirrah' is one of those used, it has been added to the page. I have also added a notation about the 'insulting' nature of the word. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 15:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:30, 28 March 2011

Seriously, this fight again?--Linden 13:30, 28 March 2011 (EDT)


In your opinion is an insult. Other people have chosen to use it as an honorific for knighthood. Some others use the myriad of other words. --Linden 22:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

...

Actually, according to several online references, it's a term indicating that the person addressed is:

  1. Male
  2. Inferior to you in some way

It's a variant on "Sir", but (from what I see floating around the intarwebs), not a complimentary one. I suppose ElSpeth could be Taking It Back.

Meh.

--Lucas 00:28, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

The word is an insult. All the reputable dictionaries agree, as does historical usage. Check out Random House, Websters, or American Heritage. "Sir" is a root word of "sirrah", but that does not mean it means the same thing. It is a derogatory term, typically indicating a male due to it having "sir" as a root word.

"Sir" is the redirect for all honorifics for knighthood. Since 'Sirrah' is one of those used, it has been added to the page. I have also added a notation about the 'insulting' nature of the word. --Linden 15:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)