Difference between revisions of "Talk:Creampuff"

From AmtWiki
m (moved Talk:Castings Spellflinger to Talk:Sir Creampuff: His Squire said so)
(→‎Titles in titles: new section)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
4/20/08 - Threw a picture of Castings on there, and removed the "Knights missing photos" cat. Also added his ORK link. -Fiks
 
4/20/08 - Threw a picture of Castings on there, and removed the "Knights missing photos" cat. Also added his ORK link. -Fiks
 +
 +
== Titles in titles ==
 +
 +
...and other things that are difficult to explain in brief (see also "Amtgard bans" and "AmtWiki bans").
 +
 +
As per the current (and future) policies of AmtWiki, titles earned in Amtgard do not belong in the title of the AmtWiki page. Titles change (even knightly accolades!) and belong in the text of the body only. Article titles should be the persona name, accolade-free. Moved this from [[Sir Creampuff]] for this reason. [[User:Ricken|Ricken]] ([[User talk:Ricken|talk]]) 03:47, 21 April 2016 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 07:47, 21 April 2016

4/20/08 - Threw a picture of Castings on there, and removed the "Knights missing photos" cat. Also added his ORK link. -Fiks

Titles in titles

...and other things that are difficult to explain in brief (see also "Amtgard bans" and "AmtWiki bans").

As per the current (and future) policies of AmtWiki, titles earned in Amtgard do not belong in the title of the AmtWiki page. Titles change (even knightly accolades!) and belong in the text of the body only. Article titles should be the persona name, accolade-free. Moved this from Sir Creampuff for this reason. Ricken (talk) 03:47, 21 April 2016 (EDT)