Talk:Moving Trees

Substantial Editing

---

I've added to the Moving Trees page and I will continue to do so. Munch

Added some more player names. Munch

Confirmed active, on Facebook. --Linden 22:20, 24 December 2010 (EST)

Up dated populace names, and Election results Munch 4-26-11

A good scrubbing, some spit and polish, she looks better than ever! I feel these changes are conservative, and fair. --Munch Ironfistersson 07:39, 7 July 2013 (EDT)

added Category's and an ORK link for the populaces records --Munch Ironfistersson 07:57, 7 July 2013 (EDT)

---

Merging moving trees page in to the sacred wind page, IMO having to pages for the same land is non-optimal. Munch Ironfistersson 22:42, 13 April 2015 (EDT)

All previous lands have their own page, even if renamed. Please keep the Moving Trees page as a defunct park and edit the Sacred Winds page as an active park. Ricken (talk) 00:29, 14 April 2015 (EDT)

Hi Ricken. As per AmtWiki:Rules#Chapter_pages I did not delete the Moving Trees page, and I also left the Categories in-place as well. Your right though I should have left the defunct listings in-place. Beyond that in the past I was not able to find any rules that precluded redirects...I just took another look around I stile cant seem-to find anything about redirects, redirect restrictions or redirect guidelines specifically. :-( Help:Linking for example does not mention redirects at all, also a general search revels hundreds of examples of redirects used in a similar way. To my-mind this looks like a conventional and ubiquitous use. I will what on your response, and I Thank you for your time. Munch Ironfistersson 08:49, 14 April 2015 (EDT)

Our policies and guidelines are currently being expanded and rewritten to reflect our unwritten practices. The help section is also in the middle of an expansion, and will mention redirects when it's completed. Redirects are not added to pages alaready containing information, and chapter pages with information are not blanked unless they are duplicate pages and the contents of all pages are being merged. In this case, the two parks are considered separate. Sorry about the confusion. Ricken (talk) 14:51, 14 April 2015 (EDT)

Ricken I thank you for your prompt response. :-D "unless they are duplicate pages and the contents of all pages are being merged." To merged the pages, This was my intention. I well continue with the merge. but hold of on any further redirects in-till that time when the "wrighen" policies and guidelines clarify their use. ;-) Munch Ironfistersson 16:05, 14 April 2015 (EDT)