Difference between revisions of "User talk:Lurker"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Yeah, sorry about that Lucas, I couldn't tell if there was something there before that edit... I thought it was just an added spam link. I'll look in the history next time. | Yeah, sorry about that Lucas, I couldn't tell if there was something there before that edit... I thought it was just an added spam link. I'll look in the history next time. | ||
| − | While I agree with you, This is a copy past of what the banning officer posted. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 13:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | + | While I agree with you, This is a copy past(e) of what the banning officer posted. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 13:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | ====Gloricaan==== | ||
| + | We have continuing disagreements about his uses of the wiki. But the offices listed are actually allowed. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 12:47, 27 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:47, 27 October 2009
Why do you think the handles are too long? --Linden 18:06, 5 February 2009 (EST) By Pixel count, the red sword has a handle that is approximately 45% of the sword's length. The same goes roughly for the blue sword. I suppose if you were using some weird fish-eye lens on your camera, then the proportions might be that messed up, but the fact of the matter is that they appear illegal. Regardless of whether or not they would be legal if we measured the real things by hand, it is appearances that matter the most on an online encyclopedia, so we should at least try to find swords that 'appear legal', if that is at all possible. -Lurker
Thanks for the heads up. Must not have spacebared appropriately. --Linden 20:38, 18 February 2009 (EST)
Not a problem; I so often have the urge to go through pages and correct the grammar, that it was very liberating to finally see something that actually *needed* to be changed. --Lurker 21:41, 18 February 2009 (EST)
- Killing Spam: Good.
- Not replacing what they destroyed: Less good. I fixed it. Just something to look for in the future. Thus is Knowledge Gained.
--Lucas 12:48, 9 April 2009 (EDT) Yeah, sorry about that Lucas, I couldn't tell if there was something there before that edit... I thought it was just an added spam link. I'll look in the history next time.
While I agree with you, This is a copy past(e) of what the banning officer posted. --Linden 13:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Gloricaan
We have continuing disagreements about his uses of the wiki. But the offices listed are actually allowed. --Linden 12:47, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
