Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tent"
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
/shrug We've got a page for [[Crowns]] and a page for [[Kusode]] each of these are less useful to the average amtgarder than a tent. Plus if I get everyone to pick up my pavilion lust then I won't feel so sad and lonely. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 21:59, 20 February 2009 (EST) | /shrug We've got a page for [[Crowns]] and a page for [[Kusode]] each of these are less useful to the average amtgarder than a tent. Plus if I get everyone to pick up my pavilion lust then I won't feel so sad and lonely. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 21:59, 20 February 2009 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I am just giving you crap. Differentiating the tents and pavilions, and encouraging people to know more is always good. We really do appreciate all the things you do. [[User:Hannoske|Hannoske]] 18:56, 22 February 2009 (EST) |
Revision as of 23:56, 22 February 2009
Ok, I understand we want to be all inclusive, and have the most information possible, but really? A page for tents? This may be going to far. Next you are going to show me a page on proper grammar or something... actually, that one might be useful, point all of the E-sam trolls to it. Hannoske 11:42, 20 February 2009 (EST)
/shrug We've got a page for Crowns and a page for Kusode each of these are less useful to the average amtgarder than a tent. Plus if I get everyone to pick up my pavilion lust then I won't feel so sad and lonely. --Linden 21:59, 20 February 2009 (EST)
I am just giving you crap. Differentiating the tents and pavilions, and encouraging people to know more is always good. We really do appreciate all the things you do. Hannoske 18:56, 22 February 2009 (EST)