Difference between revisions of "User talk:Lurker"
From AmtWiki
(New page: Why do you think the handles are too long? --~~~~) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why do you think the handles are too long? --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 18:06, 5 February 2009 (EST) | Why do you think the handles are too long? --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 18:06, 5 February 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | By Pixel count, the red sword has a handle that is approximately 45% of the sword's length. The same goes roughly for the blue sword. I suppose if you were using some weird fish-eye lens on your camera, then the proportions might be that messed up, but the fact of the matter is that they appear illegal. Regardless of whether or not they would be legal if we measured the real things by hand, it is appearances that matter the most on an online encyclopedia, so we should at least try to find swords that 'appear legal', if that is at all possible. -Lurker | ||
Revision as of 06:28, 6 February 2009
Why do you think the handles are too long? --Linden 18:06, 5 February 2009 (EST) By Pixel count, the red sword has a handle that is approximately 45% of the sword's length. The same goes roughly for the blue sword. I suppose if you were using some weird fish-eye lens on your camera, then the proportions might be that messed up, but the fact of the matter is that they appear illegal. Regardless of whether or not they would be legal if we measured the real things by hand, it is appearances that matter the most on an online encyclopedia, so we should at least try to find swords that 'appear legal', if that is at all possible. -Lurker
