Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jaded Amtgardians Retirement Home"
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
You, and your friend are the only one removing content from the wiki with out discussion. So in effect, you are the ones dictating the content. Shawn is the one who likes to call Austin Amtgard "Ditch central", He is also the person that wrote the comments you removed from Joe's page. Before pointing fingers you might actually do a bit a research. But then Imagine that some one who doesn't have the onus to sign his own posts can't be bothered by that. Have you any other reasons to remove the content from the page? -Linden | You, and your friend are the only one removing content from the wiki with out discussion. So in effect, you are the ones dictating the content. Shawn is the one who likes to call Austin Amtgard "Ditch central", He is also the person that wrote the comments you removed from Joe's page. Before pointing fingers you might actually do a bit a research. But then Imagine that some one who doesn't have the onus to sign his own posts can't be bothered by that. Have you any other reasons to remove the content from the page? -Linden | ||
| + | |||
| + | I suppose one could do up a page for "nicknames of Austin and put all that there, and link that to here, that a fair compromise. BTW, you can sign your posts (such as in discussion) by putting four ~ marks in a row, like this: [[User:Roger|Roger]] 16:11, 26 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:11, 26 October 2007
Anonymous editor please do not remove information from pages with out discussion. Linden
Also, please remember to add useless information.
There is no reason to be less than civil. Please refrain from personal comments. If there is a reason you think that bit of the article should be removed then state it. Linden
Also, personal comments can only be made by Linden. See vast history of Linden's personal comments for verification.
You still haven't given a reason to remove the lines from the article. At this point, I'm pretty sure there isn't one. Linden
It's useless. The title references the city, not Austin Amtgard. Austin Amtgard had other names given by the EH'ers who used JAR as a description.
This is an amtwiki. it seems only logical to reference other nick names for the area. -Linden
Except those nick names aren't really used by anyone. Tori-Mar is/was a park in austin. TFP is exactly that and isn't a catch all term for Austin. Ditch Central is the only one that really fits the description and it's use is marginal at best (Dalos and yourself calling Austin "Ditch Central" doesn't really go anywhere in terms of adapted usage). It's nice to know that you get to dictate content though!
You, and your friend are the only one removing content from the wiki with out discussion. So in effect, you are the ones dictating the content. Shawn is the one who likes to call Austin Amtgard "Ditch central", He is also the person that wrote the comments you removed from Joe's page. Before pointing fingers you might actually do a bit a research. But then Imagine that some one who doesn't have the onus to sign his own posts can't be bothered by that. Have you any other reasons to remove the content from the page? -Linden
I suppose one could do up a page for "nicknames of Austin and put all that there, and link that to here, that a fair compromise. BTW, you can sign your posts (such as in discussion) by putting four ~ marks in a row, like this: Roger 16:11, 26 October 2007 (EDT)
