Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ruuna"

From AmtWiki
(New page: Please refrain from changing Baronette to Baronet. This has happened at least twice now. The scroll she received from Countess Dame Savaen says Baronette, and the Amtwiki entry for Baron...)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Please refrain from changing Baronette to Baronet.  This has happened at least twice now.  The scroll she received from Countess Dame Savaen says Baronette, and the Amtwiki entry for Baronet listes Baronette as the female version of the title.  Thanks!  Khanar
 
Please refrain from changing Baronette to Baronet.  This has happened at least twice now.  The scroll she received from Countess Dame Savaen says Baronette, and the Amtwiki entry for Baronet listes Baronette as the female version of the title.  Thanks!  Khanar
 +
 +
The change will further be respected. Ruuna is of course allowed to chose how her title is displayed. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 13:07, 4 March 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
My apologies.  Won't happen again.  --[[User:LucasTheLost|Lucas]] 14:57, 4 March 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
 +
Congratulations! --[[User:LucasTheLost|Lucas]] 17:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:04, 10 August 2009

Please refrain from changing Baronette to Baronet. This has happened at least twice now. The scroll she received from Countess Dame Savaen says Baronette, and the Amtwiki entry for Baronet listes Baronette as the female version of the title. Thanks! Khanar

The change will further be respected. Ruuna is of course allowed to chose how her title is displayed. --Linden 13:07, 4 March 2009 (EST)

My apologies. Won't happen again. --Lucas 14:57, 4 March 2009 (EST)


Congratulations! --Lucas 17:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC)