Difference between revisions of "User talk:GloricanDeCelestus"

From AmtWiki
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
According to your previous edits you belong to the temples miles militia and the company Kabal. Since apparently their are no longer any members of the militia, and it was extremely short lived I will delete that information from the wiki. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 09:57, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
 
According to your previous edits you belong to the temples miles militia and the company Kabal. Since apparently their are no longer any members of the militia, and it was extremely short lived I will delete that information from the wiki. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 09:57, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
  
Ahh.. i deleted that off my page a while ago. Didnt' knwo you had kept its page open. Templu sMiles Militia is a multi game group.. Darkon, Amtgard and Dagorhir.. we decided to be just a household in Amtgard till we get more members/interest.
+
Ahh.. i deleted that off my page a while ago. Didn't know you had kept its page open. Templus Miles Militia is a multi game group.. Darkon, Amtgard and Dagorhir... we decided to be just a household in Amtgard till we get more members/interest.
  
 
Removed the 'sherriff of durring the time that the group you were a member of was defunct. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 14:52, 19 July 2008 (EDT)
 
Removed the 'sherriff of durring the time that the group you were a member of was defunct. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 14:52, 19 July 2008 (EDT)
  
You knwo i'm getting realyl tired o you talkin to me as though i was an idiot and dont' knwo waht i'm doing... I have a 157 IQ so i'm anyhtign BUT and idiot... bad typer yes, idiot no. The gropu wasn't defeunct i jsut ralized after remember y legal class and discussing it with a lawyers friend of mine. Ilith Oloth, which we changed the name of to shattered lands, was created by force of legal contract between I, my friend, and BLs all of whom signed the contract and it was notarized. Nether party of the contract agrement have violatd the terms of said contract there by, the peramiters of the contract and the articles within still stand. In other words before this review i had THOUGHT my gropu was defunct. AFTER looking the legality of it over again, the correct legal standing is that Ilith Oloth WASN'T defunct. Nor CAN it be unless a participating party on our end were to violate the contract, which we have not done, or by our park disbanding.
+
You know I'm getting really tired of you talking to me as though I was an idiot and don't know what I'm doing... I have a 157 IQ so I'm anything BUT and idiot... bad typer yes, idiot no. The group wasn't defunct I just realized after remember my legal class and discussing it with a lawyers friend of mine. Ilith Oloth, which we changed the name of to shattered lands, was created by force of legal contract between I, my friend, and BL all of whom signed the contract and it was notarized. Nether party of the contract agreement have violated the terms of said contract there by, the rules of the contract and the articles within still stand. In other words before this review i had THOUGHT my group was defunct. AFTER looking the legality of it over again, the correct legal standing is that Ilith Oloth WASN'T defunct. Nor CAN it be unless a participating party on our end were to violate the contract, which we have not done, or by our park disbanding.
  
 
It was defunct. There were no players playing. Hence 'defunct'. You can't have been the sheriff of a group that was not active. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 13:47, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
 
It was defunct. There were no players playing. Hence 'defunct'. You can't have been the sheriff of a group that was not active. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 13:47, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
  
1. I know the law.. amtgard decided to use legal contracts as the mechanism for adding new grous so amtgard is bound by that.
+
1. I know the law.. Amtgard decided to use legal contracts as the mechanism for adding new groups so Amtgard is bound by that.
2. Ther has always been players, during that period we had less than 5 for average attendance whic i had always been told by word of mouth was required for a group to be in existance. But as i previously said. I was wrong on that issue according to US federal contract law nad in the commonwelth of VA, where our park is located, as long as we on our end lived up to the contract the aprkis still in existance.
+
2. There has always been players, during that period we had less than 5 for average attendance which I had always been told by word of mouth was required for a group to be in existence. But as I previously said. I was wrong on that issue according to US federal contract law and in the commonwealth of VA, where our park is located, as long as we on our end lived up to the contract the park is still in existence.
Soeither way you want to looka t it... either form the lamen's way of using person activity to decide it there were always mmbers; or if you want to use the LEGAL way which is the important one because its a legal contract, we never ciesed to exist, therefore legally cannot be classified as defunct durign that tiem period.
+
So either way you want to look at it... either from the lamen's way of using person activity to decide it there were always members; or if you want to use the LEGAL way which is the important one because its a legal contract, we never ceased to exist, therefore legally cannot be classified as defunct during that time period.
  
 
My argument stands, yours doesn't. You are trying to pad your page with more terms in office. It is well known that the chapter was under attendance requirements and was not active during the period. Hence you can't have been an officer of the chapter. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 14:04, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
 
My argument stands, yours doesn't. You are trying to pad your page with more terms in office. It is well known that the chapter was under attendance requirements and was not active during the period. Hence you can't have been an officer of the chapter. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 14:04, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
Your page has been protected due to the addition of suspect information. If you can present proof other your own view that the chapter was active and that you were and elected officer of said chapter you may re add the information. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 14:10, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
 
Your page has been protected due to the addition of suspect information. If you can present proof other your own view that the chapter was active and that you were and elected officer of said chapter you may re add the information. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 14:10, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
  
OH MY F***ING GOD ARE YOU NOT LISTENING?! LEGALLY THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS MINIMUM POPULATON REQUIREMENTS!! BY CONTRACT HTERE ARE NO MINIMUM ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR A SHIRE!!! THE CONTRACT I SIGNED AND SARAH SIGNED AND BURNING LANDS SIGNED DOES NOT MANDATE MINIMUM ATTENDANCE. I'M NOT TRYING TO POD ANYTHING I HAVE OCD ABOUT CORRECTNESS. MY PAGE MUST BE CORRECT AND YOU ARE GETTIGN IN THE WAY OF THAT.. AND YOU ARE DEFAMING MY CHARACTER BECAUSE NOW ANYONE WHO LOOKS AT MY AMTWIKI PAGE AND TALKSTO ME WILL BE ABLE TO NOTE THAT THEY ARE DIFFERENT WHICH WOULD LEAD THEM SO THAT THEY MIGHT BELIEVE I'M LIEING. YOU ARE ACCUSING ME OF BEING IN THE WRONG LEGALLY THE BURDEN OF PROOF OF CONTRACT BREACH IS ON THE ACCUSER NOT THE ACCUSED, I DON'T HAVE TO PROVE ANYTHING.
+
OH MY F***ING GOD ARE YOU NOT LISTENING?! LEGALLY THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS MINIMUM POPULATION REQUIREMENTS!! BY CONTRACT THERE ARE NO MINIMUM ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR A SHIRE!!! THE CONTRACT I SIGNED AND SARAH SIGNED AND BURNING LANDS SIGNED DOES NOT MANDATE MINIMUM ATTENDANCE. I'M NOT TRYING TO POD ANYTHING I HAVE OCD ABOUT CORRECTNESS. MY PAGE MUST BE CORRECT AND YOU ARE GETTING IN THE WAY OF THAT.. AND YOU ARE DEFAMING MY CHARACTER BECAUSE NOW ANYONE WHO LOOKS AT MY AMTWIKI PAGE AND TALKS TO ME WILL BE ABLE TO NOTE THAT THEY ARE DIFFERENT WHICH WOULD LEAD THEM SO THAT THEY MIGHT BELIEVE I'M LIEING. YOU ARE ACCUSING ME OF BEING IN THE WRONG LEGALLY THE BURDEN OF PROOF OF CONTRACT BREACH IS ON THE ACCUSER NOT THE ACCUSED, I DON'T HAVE TO PROVE ANYTHING.
  
I'm tired of peopel giveing me the shaft for shit beyon my control.. you changed my ork description.. i said it was my innacurate ork.. because it is innacurate.. HORRIBLE so. You change my page without having the correct informantion or not knwoing what your'e talkign about. Liek that whole in 2 companies thing.
+
I'm tired of people giving me the shaft for shit beyon my control.. you changed my ork description.. I said it was my inaccurate ork.. because it is inaccurate.. HORRIBLE so. You change my page without having the correct information or not knowing what you're talking about. Like that whole in 2 companies thing.
  
 
I finally have a some outlet where i can make sure the TRUTH  about me is posted and you have to go fuck that up to.  
 
I finally have a some outlet where i can make sure the TRUTH  about me is posted and you have to go fuck that up to.  
Line 32: Line 32:
 
A new group may become a shire upon signing, and approval, of this contract." (whole thing can be found here http://www.pdfdownload.org/pdf2html/pdf2html.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Famtgardinc.com%2Fblpages%2F..%2Fbldocs%2FContract2008.pdf&images=yes) I haven't violated a single article OF that contract and BL hasn't notified me that they violated it on there end. Legally the contract stands.
 
A new group may become a shire upon signing, and approval, of this contract." (whole thing can be found here http://www.pdfdownload.org/pdf2html/pdf2html.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Famtgardinc.com%2Fblpages%2F..%2Fbldocs%2FContract2008.pdf&images=yes) I haven't violated a single article OF that contract and BL hasn't notified me that they violated it on there end. Legally the contract stands.
  
So do I have to talk to roger, or sue you, or sue roger or what, because I'm serious when I say I have OCD about my shit being correct. And about ther NOt being false information about me out there.
+
So do I have to talk to roger, or sue you, or sue roger or what, because I'm serious when I say I have OCD about my shit being correct. And about there NOT being false information about me out there.
  
 
I have done everything right, properly, and correct, and yet you still seek to be a thron in my side and shaft me anyways.
 
I have done everything right, properly, and correct, and yet you still seek to be a thron in my side and shaft me anyways.
 +
 +
Those who respect others, and act 'properly and right and correct' don't talk to them this way. My goal here is to make the wiki as accurate as possible. By claiming to have been in office during the time that a chapter was defunct you are lying. You are also implying that the chapter was active, another lie. Where you elected to office by your populous? You have yet to answer that question.
 +
 +
If you ORK is inaccurate why not update it? The only reason it doesn't reflect what you feel to be true is because you have failed up date that information. Does your local Prime Minister not agree with your version of events? --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 15:08, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
1. I respect those who earn it.
 +
2. I DO NOT LIE!
 +
3. Group was active, by contract active = people there and Amtgard RoP are being followed... so active not defunct.
 +
4. My current PM Mono only knows what's happened since he' been here.. he's only been here for about a year, IF that long. And I don't appreciate your tone of language "what you feel to be true" and "your version of events" I say it happened because it happened.. if it was just my opinion, I'd say I believe it happened.
 +
5. My PM won't back log missing stuff, he says he can only verify what he personally knows so no back logging; and wont' give me the password to the PM section of the ork. EVERY PM at solstice from the time I joined minus the 1st one have been inaccurate with my credits which is the main reason that 7 of the peopel who left solstice left.
 +
6. Claiming to be in office when you actually were is not lieing.
 +
7. If your goal is to make it as accurate as possible then you wouldn't be getting in my way.
 +
8. My group records moved to a submarine someone in the pacific fleet with their holder when he was stationed in CA. Having the sheets of paper or not does not determine what did or did not happen. I'm here telling you what happened. Amtgard IS built around an honor system.
 +
9. I thought you'd be able to tell the answer to "Where you elected to office by your populous?" when I keep saying that I was monarch then. Of course.. I won EVERY election I ran for in that group... The group were all members of my house and/or members of my clan of KaBaL. They all agreed that not only did I do a good job but it made sense to keep electing me to match the RP situation.
 +
10. I agree I shouldn't've used the little bit of profane language that I did. for that I apologize. That being said I have done everything when it comes to living up to my contract, following the rules and regulations of Amtgard, and record keeping correctly.
 +
 +
If you were keeping your records correctly, then you would have proof of your awards. If this continues to be a problem for you, why not seek out the other chapters which gave you the awards. Wouldn't there be some one left that would know? Since you claim to have been the sheriff that whole time, so you couldn't have given awards to yourself. Do you need help getting the necessary information? Have you tried talking to Solstice? --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 19:53, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
Technically you can give yourself awards, there nothing in the corpora that says you can't.. BUT it is a bad thing to do and its just REALLY bad form.
 +
No because i was never PM.. kenny was my PM most of the time and he took all his stuff with him when he got deployed.. the only reason I know what I should have is because I've been keeping track myself.. kenny has the official forms where ever he took them.
 +
The problem with solstice is that Angela despises me and even if she didn't... she disappeared from Amtgard... Walker moved to Washington state a couple years ago and as of 3 months ago... for all intents and purposes quit Amtgard... and these was before the ORK was around ''(or at least know one out here on the east coast knew about it if it did exist'') so I have to find 3 people 1 of whom hates me, HOPE they kept the records from Amtgard, HOPE that even if they kept them that they have all of them and haven't lost any, and then hope that they'd be willing to help. I seriously doubt that's anywhere NEAR probable.
 +
 +
== Um ==
 +
There is really way too much clutter on this page. Can we remove some? --[[User:Lurker|Lurker]] 05:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 +
*So what clutter is it that you speak of> All I have is the factual information on here. --[[User:GloricanDeCelestus|GloricanDeCelestus]] 05:28, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 +
**Things that are not good but that you have on your page:
 +
***when you joined a given house/what position you have; it's one thing to list these things for a company or whatever, and another to list them for every group you are affiliated with, with multiple lines for each.
 +
***multiple enormous images.
 +
***listing of offices held; this is what the ORK is for
 +
***A ridiculous amount of external links at the bottom of the page.
 +
--[[User:Lurker|Lurker]] 08:19, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Militus Morti ==
 +
Please combine these two nearly identical pages. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 12:59, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 +
*How would you like me to? One's a household, the other a company with some members not being in both, with different offices and titles. So please suggestions.--[[User:GloricanDeCelestus|GloricanDeCelestus]] 20:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
I'm sure a smart fella like you can figure it out. Also please remove the links to your own page, under 'other personas'. It's redundant and unnecessary. --[[User:Linden|Linden]] 20:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
*I want you to tell me cause no matter what I do on my own, you seem to have a problem with it.

Latest revision as of 21:40, 27 October 2009

Glorican, chose one persona, and add the information about the other to that page. --Linden 17:18, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

Glorican, according to the rule book a player may only belong to one fighting company. --Linden 08:59, 17 June 2008 (EDT)

Listings of individual awards are located on the ORK, not the Wiki. If you continue to ignore my admonishments I will be forced to lock your pages and remove any extraneous content. --Linden 11:20, 17 June 2008 (EDT)

According to your previous edits you belong to the temples miles militia and the company Kabal. Since apparently their are no longer any members of the militia, and it was extremely short lived I will delete that information from the wiki. --Linden 09:57, 18 June 2008 (EDT)

Ahh.. i deleted that off my page a while ago. Didn't know you had kept its page open. Templus Miles Militia is a multi game group.. Darkon, Amtgard and Dagorhir... we decided to be just a household in Amtgard till we get more members/interest.

Removed the 'sherriff of durring the time that the group you were a member of was defunct. --Linden 14:52, 19 July 2008 (EDT)

You know I'm getting really tired of you talking to me as though I was an idiot and don't know what I'm doing... I have a 157 IQ so I'm anything BUT and idiot... bad typer yes, idiot no. The group wasn't defunct I just realized after remember my legal class and discussing it with a lawyers friend of mine. Ilith Oloth, which we changed the name of to shattered lands, was created by force of legal contract between I, my friend, and BL all of whom signed the contract and it was notarized. Nether party of the contract agreement have violated the terms of said contract there by, the rules of the contract and the articles within still stand. In other words before this review i had THOUGHT my group was defunct. AFTER looking the legality of it over again, the correct legal standing is that Ilith Oloth WASN'T defunct. Nor CAN it be unless a participating party on our end were to violate the contract, which we have not done, or by our park disbanding.

It was defunct. There were no players playing. Hence 'defunct'. You can't have been the sheriff of a group that was not active. --Linden 13:47, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

1. I know the law.. Amtgard decided to use legal contracts as the mechanism for adding new groups so Amtgard is bound by that. 2. There has always been players, during that period we had less than 5 for average attendance which I had always been told by word of mouth was required for a group to be in existence. But as I previously said. I was wrong on that issue according to US federal contract law and in the commonwealth of VA, where our park is located, as long as we on our end lived up to the contract the park is still in existence. So either way you want to look at it... either from the lamen's way of using person activity to decide it there were always members; or if you want to use the LEGAL way which is the important one because its a legal contract, we never ceased to exist, therefore legally cannot be classified as defunct during that time period.

My argument stands, yours doesn't. You are trying to pad your page with more terms in office. It is well known that the chapter was under attendance requirements and was not active during the period. Hence you can't have been an officer of the chapter. --Linden 14:04, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Your page has been protected due to the addition of suspect information. If you can present proof other your own view that the chapter was active and that you were and elected officer of said chapter you may re add the information. --Linden 14:10, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

OH MY F***ING GOD ARE YOU NOT LISTENING?! LEGALLY THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS MINIMUM POPULATION REQUIREMENTS!! BY CONTRACT THERE ARE NO MINIMUM ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR A SHIRE!!! THE CONTRACT I SIGNED AND SARAH SIGNED AND BURNING LANDS SIGNED DOES NOT MANDATE MINIMUM ATTENDANCE. I'M NOT TRYING TO POD ANYTHING I HAVE OCD ABOUT CORRECTNESS. MY PAGE MUST BE CORRECT AND YOU ARE GETTING IN THE WAY OF THAT.. AND YOU ARE DEFAMING MY CHARACTER BECAUSE NOW ANYONE WHO LOOKS AT MY AMTWIKI PAGE AND TALKS TO ME WILL BE ABLE TO NOTE THAT THEY ARE DIFFERENT WHICH WOULD LEAD THEM SO THAT THEY MIGHT BELIEVE I'M LIEING. YOU ARE ACCUSING ME OF BEING IN THE WRONG LEGALLY THE BURDEN OF PROOF OF CONTRACT BREACH IS ON THE ACCUSER NOT THE ACCUSED, I DON'T HAVE TO PROVE ANYTHING.

I'm tired of people giving me the shaft for shit beyon my control.. you changed my ork description.. I said it was my inaccurate ork.. because it is inaccurate.. HORRIBLE so. You change my page without having the correct information or not knowing what you're talking about. Like that whole in 2 companies thing.

I finally have a some outlet where i can make sure the TRUTH about me is posted and you have to go fuck that up to.

The contract for shire as listed on BL website says says "A A new group may become a shire upon signing, and approval, of this contract." (whole thing can be found here http://www.pdfdownload.org/pdf2html/pdf2html.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Famtgardinc.com%2Fblpages%2F..%2Fbldocs%2FContract2008.pdf&images=yes) I haven't violated a single article OF that contract and BL hasn't notified me that they violated it on there end. Legally the contract stands.

So do I have to talk to roger, or sue you, or sue roger or what, because I'm serious when I say I have OCD about my shit being correct. And about there NOT being false information about me out there.

I have done everything right, properly, and correct, and yet you still seek to be a thron in my side and shaft me anyways.

Those who respect others, and act 'properly and right and correct' don't talk to them this way. My goal here is to make the wiki as accurate as possible. By claiming to have been in office during the time that a chapter was defunct you are lying. You are also implying that the chapter was active, another lie. Where you elected to office by your populous? You have yet to answer that question.

If you ORK is inaccurate why not update it? The only reason it doesn't reflect what you feel to be true is because you have failed up date that information. Does your local Prime Minister not agree with your version of events? --Linden 15:08, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

1. I respect those who earn it. 2. I DO NOT LIE! 3. Group was active, by contract active = people there and Amtgard RoP are being followed... so active not defunct. 4. My current PM Mono only knows what's happened since he' been here.. he's only been here for about a year, IF that long. And I don't appreciate your tone of language "what you feel to be true" and "your version of events" I say it happened because it happened.. if it was just my opinion, I'd say I believe it happened. 5. My PM won't back log missing stuff, he says he can only verify what he personally knows so no back logging; and wont' give me the password to the PM section of the ork. EVERY PM at solstice from the time I joined minus the 1st one have been inaccurate with my credits which is the main reason that 7 of the peopel who left solstice left. 6. Claiming to be in office when you actually were is not lieing. 7. If your goal is to make it as accurate as possible then you wouldn't be getting in my way. 8. My group records moved to a submarine someone in the pacific fleet with their holder when he was stationed in CA. Having the sheets of paper or not does not determine what did or did not happen. I'm here telling you what happened. Amtgard IS built around an honor system. 9. I thought you'd be able to tell the answer to "Where you elected to office by your populous?" when I keep saying that I was monarch then. Of course.. I won EVERY election I ran for in that group... The group were all members of my house and/or members of my clan of KaBaL. They all agreed that not only did I do a good job but it made sense to keep electing me to match the RP situation. 10. I agree I shouldn't've used the little bit of profane language that I did. for that I apologize. That being said I have done everything when it comes to living up to my contract, following the rules and regulations of Amtgard, and record keeping correctly.

If you were keeping your records correctly, then you would have proof of your awards. If this continues to be a problem for you, why not seek out the other chapters which gave you the awards. Wouldn't there be some one left that would know? Since you claim to have been the sheriff that whole time, so you couldn't have given awards to yourself. Do you need help getting the necessary information? Have you tried talking to Solstice? --Linden 19:53, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Technically you can give yourself awards, there nothing in the corpora that says you can't.. BUT it is a bad thing to do and its just REALLY bad form. No because i was never PM.. kenny was my PM most of the time and he took all his stuff with him when he got deployed.. the only reason I know what I should have is because I've been keeping track myself.. kenny has the official forms where ever he took them. The problem with solstice is that Angela despises me and even if she didn't... she disappeared from Amtgard... Walker moved to Washington state a couple years ago and as of 3 months ago... for all intents and purposes quit Amtgard... and these was before the ORK was around (or at least know one out here on the east coast knew about it if it did exist) so I have to find 3 people 1 of whom hates me, HOPE they kept the records from Amtgard, HOPE that even if they kept them that they have all of them and haven't lost any, and then hope that they'd be willing to help. I seriously doubt that's anywhere NEAR probable.

Um

There is really way too much clutter on this page. Can we remove some? --Lurker 05:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

  • So what clutter is it that you speak of> All I have is the factual information on here. --GloricanDeCelestus 05:28, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
    • Things that are not good but that you have on your page:
      • when you joined a given house/what position you have; it's one thing to list these things for a company or whatever, and another to list them for every group you are affiliated with, with multiple lines for each.
      • multiple enormous images.
      • listing of offices held; this is what the ORK is for
      • A ridiculous amount of external links at the bottom of the page.

--Lurker 08:19, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Militus Morti

Please combine these two nearly identical pages. --Linden 12:59, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

  • How would you like me to? One's a household, the other a company with some members not being in both, with different offices and titles. So please suggestions.--GloricanDeCelestus 20:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm sure a smart fella like you can figure it out. Also please remove the links to your own page, under 'other personas'. It's redundant and unnecessary. --Linden 20:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

  • I want you to tell me cause no matter what I do on my own, you seem to have a problem with it.