Difference between revisions of "AmtWiki talk:Admin portal"

From AmtWiki
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="width: 100%; background: #89CFF0; text-align:center;">
+
[[Category:Wiki_Admin_Pages]]
This page serves as a centralised place for administrative discussions.
 
 
 
To start a new topic please click the + or Add Topic button.  Please remember to sign your messages with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>.  Be sure to indent replies with a colon (:).
 
</div>
 
 
 
 
== "Admin Attention" categories ==
 
== "Admin Attention" categories ==
  
 
I definitely want to make this part the main focus of the admin portal once it's redone. Things I think should be monitored:
 
I definitely want to make this part the main focus of the admin portal once it's redone. Things I think should be monitored:
 
*misspelled/unchanged category titles
 
*misspelled/unchanged category titles
*articles for deletion
+
*[[:Category:articles for deletion]]
 
*[[:Category:pages with broken file links]]
 
*[[:Category:pages with broken file links]]
 
All other suggestions welcome.
 
All other suggestions welcome.
Line 20: Line 15:
 
*possible copyvios
 
*possible copyvios
 
[[User:Ricken|Ricken]] ([[User talk:Ricken|talk]]) 23:26, 3 April 2015 (EDT)
 
[[User:Ricken|Ricken]] ([[User talk:Ricken|talk]]) 23:26, 3 April 2015 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Resources point of contention ==
 +
 +
Half of the resources pages are lacking, and the other half are copied straight from wikipedia with little regard to the scope of this wiki.
 +
 +
No actual proposal to fix this yet ([[User:Ricken/SandboxResources|working on it]]), just wanted to rant a bit. This is going to be a long process.
 +
 +
[[User:Ricken|Ricken]] ([[User talk:Ricken|talk]]) 23:36, 29 March 2016 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 18:18, 23 May 2024

"Admin Attention" categories

I definitely want to make this part the main focus of the admin portal once it's redone. Things I think should be monitored:

All other suggestions welcome. Ricken 13:23, 30 March 2015 (EDT)

More things added to the potential watch list:

  • stubs (make hidden category for this)
  • cleanup (make hidden cat)
  • templates w/o documentation (once we get parser functions)
  • possible copyvios

Ricken (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2015 (EDT)

Resources point of contention

Half of the resources pages are lacking, and the other half are copied straight from wikipedia with little regard to the scope of this wiki.

No actual proposal to fix this yet (working on it), just wanted to rant a bit. This is going to be a long process.

Ricken (talk) 23:36, 29 March 2016 (EDT)