Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gladaeus"
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Exactly what i am talkng about. If your wiki is going to plagerize us, then do it properly regardless.. | Exactly what i am talkng about. If your wiki is going to plagerize us, then do it properly regardless.. | ||
Thank you. | Thank you. | ||
| + | |||
| + | First, there is no plagiarism at work here. Secondly, the only way to get exactly what you want on the Gladaeus page is to edit it yourself. Instead of editing the discussion page, edit the article page; that way you can be certain that your group is reflected as you see fit. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is important to understand that WIKI stands for "What I Know Is"; this is not a project of fact, it is a project of what the collective believes to be fact; mistakes do happen. Handling things appropriately and willing to be part of the solution is the best way to deal with issues like this --[[User:Bowen|Bowen]] 25 March 2008 15:37 | ||
Revision as of 19:44, 25 March 2008
We do exsist so would someone please get the information straight here?! For the record this wiki has false information on Gladaeus! Why are we even here? that someone or entity did not handle it's Responsibilty of gathering information properly..
M Karthon 3-25-2008
To be fair, this is the AmtWiki; you do not play Amtgard. Information on your game should be a secondary concern (as I imagine it is) to the primary subject of this WIKI; Amtgard. --Bowen 25 March 2008 13:54
Then correct this mess as stated regardless someone placed it here,So it need be correct. Now get busy if it may be you..
For example
Gladaeus From AmtWiki A short-lived LARP created by former members of Amtgard from Lazarus Grove.
Exactly what i am talkng about. If your wiki is going to plagerize us, then do it properly regardless.. Thank you.
First, there is no plagiarism at work here. Secondly, the only way to get exactly what you want on the Gladaeus page is to edit it yourself. Instead of editing the discussion page, edit the article page; that way you can be certain that your group is reflected as you see fit.
It is important to understand that WIKI stands for "What I Know Is"; this is not a project of fact, it is a project of what the collective believes to be fact; mistakes do happen. Handling things appropriately and willing to be part of the solution is the best way to deal with issues like this --Bowen 25 March 2008 15:37
