Difference between revisions of "Talk:Peter the Quick"
(→Copyvio: Added another comment) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{afd-talk|[[User:Ricken|Ricken]] ([[User talk:Ricken|talk]])|5 June 2014 (consideration starting 15:23, 31 March 2015 (EDT))}} | ||
| + | |||
== Copyvio == | == Copyvio == | ||
This page was [http://amtwiki.net/amtwiki/index.php?title=Peter_the_Quick&diff=next&oldid=120367 copied] from the [http://www.geddon.org/Peter_the_Quick Belegarth Wiki], which uses a license that is incompatible with ours. There is a clause in the [https://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GNU FDL] (the license of the Belegarth Wiki) for re-licensing under the [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ CC-BY-SA] (our license) but it only applies if three conditions are true: The site being copied from is a wiki (true), the date of the contents publication is in 2008 (false) and the content was re-licensed in 2009 (false). We are thus in-illegible for re-licensing. Some history, that clause, and its specificity, were put in to allow Wikipedia to re-license from GNU FDL to CC-BY-SA. Anyhow, we must delete this page and rewrite it, from scratch, without copying from the Belegarth Wiki, in order to remain in compliance with the law. [[User:Zellfaze|Zell Faze]] ([[User talk:Zellfaze|Talk]]) 18:55, 5 June 2014 (EDT) | This page was [http://amtwiki.net/amtwiki/index.php?title=Peter_the_Quick&diff=next&oldid=120367 copied] from the [http://www.geddon.org/Peter_the_Quick Belegarth Wiki], which uses a license that is incompatible with ours. There is a clause in the [https://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GNU FDL] (the license of the Belegarth Wiki) for re-licensing under the [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ CC-BY-SA] (our license) but it only applies if three conditions are true: The site being copied from is a wiki (true), the date of the contents publication is in 2008 (false) and the content was re-licensed in 2009 (false). We are thus in-illegible for re-licensing. Some history, that clause, and its specificity, were put in to allow Wikipedia to re-license from GNU FDL to CC-BY-SA. Anyhow, we must delete this page and rewrite it, from scratch, without copying from the Belegarth Wiki, in order to remain in compliance with the law. [[User:Zellfaze|Zell Faze]] ([[User talk:Zellfaze|Talk]]) 18:55, 5 June 2014 (EDT) | ||
:WE could actually just remove the Tourny section. [[User:Zellfaze|Zell Faze]] ([[User talk:Zellfaze|Talk]]) 19:00, 5 June 2014 (EDT) | :WE could actually just remove the Tourny section. [[User:Zellfaze|Zell Faze]] ([[User talk:Zellfaze|Talk]]) 19:00, 5 June 2014 (EDT) | ||
| + | : edited it, let me know if you want me to change more, [[Peter the Quick|Peter]] Dec 13 2014 | ||
| + | ::'''Keep'''. I think after PTQ's redo, no copyvio? We should be gtg. [[User:Ricken|Ricken]] ([[User talk:Ricken|talk]]) 15:23, 31 March 2015 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:23, 31 March 2015
This main article is up for deletion, put up for consideration by Ricken (talk) on 5 June 2014 (consideration starting 15:23, 31 March 2015 (EDT)). Help AmtWiki reach consensus by giving your keep or delete opinion about this page.
Articles for deletion/
Copyvio
This page was copied from the Belegarth Wiki, which uses a license that is incompatible with ours. There is a clause in the GNU FDL (the license of the Belegarth Wiki) for re-licensing under the CC-BY-SA (our license) but it only applies if three conditions are true: The site being copied from is a wiki (true), the date of the contents publication is in 2008 (false) and the content was re-licensed in 2009 (false). We are thus in-illegible for re-licensing. Some history, that clause, and its specificity, were put in to allow Wikipedia to re-license from GNU FDL to CC-BY-SA. Anyhow, we must delete this page and rewrite it, from scratch, without copying from the Belegarth Wiki, in order to remain in compliance with the law. Zell Faze (Talk) 18:55, 5 June 2014 (EDT)
