Difference between revisions of "Flurb Rating"
From AmtWiki
LucasTheLost (talk | contribs) m (Flurb Quotient moved to Flurb Rating: proper terminology.) |
m (added category) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Originally posted on [http://www.electricsamurai.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=9225&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=flurb+quotient&start=0|e-sam] by [[Matthias]]. | + | Originally posted on [http://www.electricsamurai.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=9225&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=flurb+quotient&start=0| e-sam] by [[Matthias]]. |
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
The general consensus is that a high rating is A Bad Thing, though some clearly disagree. | The general consensus is that a high rating is A Bad Thing, though some clearly disagree. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Amtgard Things]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:57, 26 March 2016
Originally posted on e-sam by Matthias.
A persona name's Flurb Rating can be discovered thusly:
- Break the full name down into it's component parts. For example, Bladestorm Shadowbane breaks down into "blade", "storm", "shadow", and "bane". Correct any "creative spelling".
- Search the ORK for each component of that name.
- Total up the number of matches.
That total is the name's Flurb Rating.
Certain words are exempt... "of", "the", and "von".
Colors, metals, and other "cool sounding" stuff will really rack up the flurbosity. Dark, shadow, blood, bone... oh yeah.
The general consensus is that a high rating is A Bad Thing, though some clearly disagree.
